From
the Editor 's Desk
My dear
readers of Journal of Extension Education,
Wish you
all a very happy New Year!
In
the recently concluded eSARD-2019
conference (International Conference on Extension for Strengthening
Agricultural Research and Development), it was surprising to note that papers
were solicited on a relatively new topic, 'ethics' under the Conference
theme, 'Extension Education and Research '.
Ethics, a much ignored part in social science research, are 'moral principles
that control or influence a person 's behaviour ' as per the Oxford Advanced Learner's
Dictionary.
The European Commission
(2018) has formulated certain ethical guidelines when conducting studies with
human subjects as participants in social science research. These guidelines are
to be followed besides avoiding serious ethical breaching such as plagiarizing and
fabrication of data. I am listing a few below.
§
Whenever
we are collecting personal data directly from research participants, we must
seek their informed consent
§
Give
participants a clear explanation of the aims, overall purpose, methods and implications
of the research
§
Explain
that participation is voluntary
§
Explain
who is funding the research and for what purpose.
§
Disclose
who will benefit from the research
§
Make
a clear commitment to treating personal and sensitive information
confidentially
§
Offer
to provide respondents with further information about research if they ask for
it
§
Give
the name and contact details of the contact person who can answer any queries participants
may have.
As professionals of
Extension Education, we may have to follow these guidelines primarily while
conducting face-to-face interviews, wherein we directly ask questions and
obtain responses or while conducting focus groups, wherein a small group of
homogenous respondents are interviewed together.
As of now, ethical
clearance for conducting such interviews and Focus groups is not insisted upon
in most of the developing countries. Many social scientists argue that since
there is no apparent harm inflicted while conducting research (unlike
health-related research, similar to the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment),
ethical clearance for such research is unnecessary. However, this situation
might change in future, as ethical issues are becoming crucial in social research.
Following the aforementioned easy-to-follow ethical guidelines could be a right
step in this direction.
This issue of JEE contains articles on diverse topics including
willingness of farmers to participate in innovation platforms, crowdsourcing
knowledge and erosion of traditional seed supply systems.
Do send your
feedback on these papers to editorextension@gmail.com.
D
Puthira Prathap
Chief
Editor
JEE 32(1)